6 Beal Valley Broadbent Moss Masterplan and Spatial Design Code
PDF 157 KB
A report, of the Executive Director of Place/Deputy Chief Executive requesting consideration of the Beal Valley and Broadbent Moss Masterplan and Spatial Design Code, prepared in accordance with Places for Everyone, criteria 1 of JPA 10 Beal Valley and criteria 1 of JPA 12 Broadbent Moss, and its incorporation into a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD).
The Council’s Constitution provides for an ‘Overview and Scrutiny body’ to invite people other than those Members and Officers referred to in Procedure Rule 12 to address it, discuss issues of local concern and/or answer questions. Such people may be, for example, representatives from partner organisations, other stakeholders or members of the public. Attendance by those persons is entirely optional, except where attendance is required by law.
The Committee will therefore follow the procedure outlined below in respect of this agenda item:
1. The Chair to invite Officers to provide a short presentation on the item.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Further to Minute x of the meeting of the Place, Economic Growth and Environment Scrutiny Board, held on 12th January 2026, Members received a report of the Executive Director of Place/Deputy Chief Executive that sought consideration of the Beal Valley and Broadbent Moss Masterplan and Spatial Design Code, that had been prepared in accordance with Places for Everyone, criteria 1 of JPA 10 Beal Valley and criteria 1 of JPA 12 Broadbent Moss, in light of the Motion agreed at the Council meeting on 10th December, (“Ensuring Statutory Scrutiny and Enforceability for Places for Everyone Masterplans”), that necessitated the requirement of the preparation of a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) incorporating this Masterplan and Spatial Design Code.
The report was due to be presented to the Cabinet, at its meeting on 23rd February 2026, where Members would consider any comments and observations presented by this Scrutiny Board. A version had already been considered by the Cabinet on 15th December 2025.
In considering the report, Members of the Scrutiny Board sought clarification on:
a. How much greenspace land was planned to be retained. The Assistant Director of Planning, Transport and Housing Delivery undertook to write to Members thereon, however he did confirm that it was intended to retain a lot of underdeveloped land to ensure opportunities were available for nature and recreation purposes.
b. The number of housing units that would be available? It was envisaged that around 1,700 houses across the area would be available.
c. In terms of the delivery plan Members asked about the site’s topography, such as did this plan consider risks and mitigation's which could affect the delivery plan. The meeting was advised that, officers would explore any challenges where they were apparent to get the infrastructure required.
d. Members noted that one benefit of the site was the metrolink line, that the Council was a landholder of.
e. Flood mitigations? Members note that some of the area could not be developed. Those parts of the site that were going to be developed members needed assurances that the fold risk was being addressed. The Environment Agency had been involved in the development of the site and the Council had encouraged the developer to engage with United Utilities and the Environment Agency in terms of drainage and flood requirements.
The Scrutiny Board was addressed by Mr. Broadbent, who raised a number of concerns regarding air pollution and contamination. He added that the Places for Everyone (PfE) programme had specific and explicit concerns and expectations of the master planning process. One key issue raised, in PfE was air quality. An integrated assessment expected the Master Plan to reduce the impact of traffic on local highway and to mitigate extra traffic. Mr Broadbent was concerned that it was planned to commence the development before the Metrolink stop came into operation in the year 2030. A Supreme Court Judgement to bring nitrogen dioxide levels down to legal levels by 2026 was proving to be problematic ... view the full minutes text for item 6
5 Beal Valley Broadbent Moss Masterplan and Spatial Design Code
PDF 89 KB
A report, of the Executive Director of Place/Deputy Chief Executive requesting consideration of the Beal Valley and Broadbent Moss Masterplan and Spatial Design Code, prepared in accordance with Places for Everyone, criteria 1 of JPA 10 Beal Valley and criteria 1 of JPA 12 Broadbent Moss, and its incorporation into a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD).
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Scrutiny Board received a report of the Executive Director of Place/Deputy Chief Executive that sought consideration of the Beal Valley and Broadbent Moss Masterplan and Spatial Design Code, that had been prepared in accordance with Places for Everyone, criteria 1 of JPA 10 Beal Valley and criteria 1 of JPA 12 Broadbent Moss, in light of the Motion agreed at the Council meeting on 10th December, (“Ensuring Statutory Scrutiny and Enforceability for Places for Everyone Masterplans”), that necessitated the requirement of the preparation of a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) incorporating this Masterplan and Spatial Design Code.
The report had previously been considered by the Cabinet at its meeting held on 15th December 2025.
A member referred to Overview and Scrutiny Procedure Rule 12 which permitted the Board to invite people other than Members of the Scrutiny Board and relevant officers to “address it, discuss issues of local concern and/or answer questions. Such people may be, for example, representatives from partner organisations, other stakeholders or members of the public. Attendance by those persons is entirely optional, except where attendance is required by law.” The Member added that members of the public attending the meeting possessed certain technical knowledge regarding this matter that could be of benefit to members in their consideration and determination of this item and as such they should be permitted to address the meeting thereon.
The Scrutiny Board briefly adjourned to seek legal advice on this matter after which it was suggested that the Board defer consideration of this item to the Board’s next meeting to allow appropriate officers to determine a suitable public participation protocol to allow interested members of the public to contribute to the meeting in a meaningful way.
Resolved:
That consideration of the Beal Valley and Broadbent Moss Masterplan and Spatial Design Code, be deferred to the next scheduled meeting of the Place, Economic Growth and Environment Scrutiny Board on Thursday, 22nd January 2026.